ATF

Sample Block


Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms

27 CFR Part 9

[TD ATF-408; Re: Notice No. 858]

RIN 1512-AA07

Chiles Valley Viticultural Area (96F-111)

AGENCY: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), Treasury.

ACTION: Treasury decision, final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Treasury decision will establish a viticultural area in
Napa County, California, to be known as "Chiles Valley". This viticultural
area is the result of a petition submitted by Mr. Volker Eisele, owner
of the Volker Eisele Vineyard and Winery.

EFFECTIVE DATE: April 19, 1999.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas B. Busey, Specialist, Regulations
Division, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, 650 Massachusetts Avenue,
NW, Washington, DC 20226, (202) 927-8230.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On August 23, 1978, ATF published Treasury decision ATF-53 (43 FR 37672,
54624) revising regulations in 27 CFR part 4. These regulations allow the
establishment of definitive viticultural areas. The regulations allow the
name of an approved viticultural area to be used as an appellation of origin
on wine labels and in wine advertisements.

On October 2, 1979, ATF published Treasury decision ATF-60 (44 FR 56692)
which added a new part 9 to 27 CFR, providing for the listing of approved
American viticultural areas, the names of which may be used as appellations
of origin.

Section 4.25a(e)(1), Title 27, CFR, defines an American viticultural
area as a delimited grape-growing region distinguishable by geographic
features, the boundaries of which have been delineated in subpart C of
part 9.

Section 4.25a(e)(2), Title 27, CFR, outlines the procedure for proposing
an American viticultural area. Any interested person may petition ATF to
establish a grape-growing region as a viticultural area. The petition should
include:

  • (a) Evidence that the name of the proposed viticultural area is locally
    and/or nationally known as referring to the area specified in the petition;
  • (b) Historical or current evidence that the boundaries of the viticultural
    area are as specified in the petition;
  • (c) Evidence relating to the geographical characteristics (climate,
    soil, elevation, physical features, etc.) which distinguish the viticultural
    features of the proposed area from surrounding areas;
  • (d) A description of the specific boundaries of the viticultural area,
    based on features which can be found on United States Geological Survey
    (U.S.G.S.) maps of the largest applicable scale, and;
  • (e) A copy (or copies) of the appropriate U.S.G.S. map(s) with the proposed
    boundaries prominently marked.

Petition

ATF received a petition from Mr. Volker Eisele, representing the Chiles
Valley District Committee proposing to establish a new viticultural area
in Napa County, California to be known as "Chiles Valley District." The
Chiles Valley viticultural area is located entirely within the Napa Valley.
The viticultural area is located in the eastern portion of Napa Valley
between and on the same latitude as St. Helena and Rutherford. It contains
approximately 6,000 acres, of which 1,000 are planted to vineyards. Four
wineries are currently active within the viticultural area.

Comments

A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Notice No. 858 (63 FR 13583) was published
in the Federal Register on March 20, 1998, requesting comments from all
interested persons concerning the proposed viticultural area. Specific
comments were requested on the use of the term "District" as part of the
viticultural area name as proposed in the original petition. ATF noticed
the proposed area as "Chiles Valley" because ATF did not find that the
petitioner submitted sufficient evidence to support the use of the term
"District" with Chiles Valley. Six comments were received in response to
this notice. All six comments favored the addition of "District" to the
viticultural name, but no additional evidence was submitted to support
this change. The six comments only reiterated the petitioner's original
argument that the use of the term "District" was important to distinguish
the Chiles Valley from the larger valley, in this case the Napa Valley.
None of the comments added any data or historical evidence for the use
of the term "District" in conjunction with Chiles Valley.

Evidence That the Name of the Area Is Locally or Nationally Known

An historical survey written by Charles Sullivan spells out the historical
use of the name Chiles Valley and vineyard plantings dating back to the
late 1800's. Numerous references exist indicating the general use of the
name "Chiles Valley" to refer to the petitioned area. The petitioner included
copies of title pages of various publications, guide and tour book references,
public and private phone book listings and Federal and State agency maps,
to illustrate the use of the name.

However, as noted above, ATF has found that neither the petitioner nor
the commenters have submitted sufficient evidence to support the use of
the term "District" with the name "Chiles Valley."

Historical or Current Evidence That the Boundaries of the Viticultural
Area Are as Specified in the Petition

The petitioner provided evidence that the boundaries establish a grape
producing area with an identifiable character and quality, based on climate,
topography, and historical tradition. The historical evidence can be dated
to the mid 1800's with a land grant from the Mexican government to Joseph
Ballinger Chiles, whose name the valley would later bear. The land grant
was called Rancho Catacula and these lands all lie within the proposed
appellation boundaries. The boundaries of the land grant are still recognized
on U.S.G.S. maps of the area. A vineyard planting was one of the earliest
agricultural operations conducted. For the most part the boundaries of
the proposed area use the land grant (Rancho line) boundary lines. This
area includes virtually all lands that in any way might be used for agricultural
purposes. Beyond the Rancho line are very steep slopes, which are mostly
part of the serpentine chaparral soil formation. Historically it is also
fairly clear that the land grant boundaries were drawn to include usable
land rather than the watershed, which, on all sides of the old Rancho Catacula,
is much further up the slopes. In sum, the boundaries encompass an area
of remarkable uniformity with respect to soils, climate and elevation that
produces a unique microclimate within the Napa Valley.

Evidence Relating to the Geographical Features (Climate, Soil, Elevation,
Physical Features, etc.) Which Distinguish Viticultural Features of the
Proposed Area From Surrounding Areas

The geographical features of the viticultural area set it apart from
the surrounding area in the Napa Valley and produce a unique microclimate.
The lands within the proposed boundaries generally lie between 800 and
1000 feet above sea level. The valley runs northwest to southeast and is
therefore an open funnel for the prevailing northwesterly winds. This fairly
constant northwesterly flow produces substantial cooling during the day
and, in combination with the altitude, relatively dry air. During the night,
this drier air leads to more rapid cooling than in most of the Napa Valley.
In addition, the narrow valley is surrounded by hills up to 2200 feet which
concentrate the cooler air flowing down the hillsides toward the valley
floor where the vineyards are located. Also, the relative distance from
the San Pablo Bay and the Pacific Ocean allows the summer fog to move in
much later than in the main Napa Valley. By the time the fog does reach
the Chiles Valley, the air temperatures have dropped much more dramatically
than in the Napa Valley, thereby causing much lower temperatures during
the night. Late fog ceiling, combined with low minimums, cause a very slow
heat buildup during the day, again producing relatively cooler average
temperatures than those found in many places of the Napa Valley. Available
data indicates a "Region Two" according to the U.C. Davis climate classification.
The growing season starts later than in the Napa Valley due to a colder
winter with temperatures dropping below 20 degrees F. The high incidence
of spring frost is another indication of the generally cooler climate conditions.

In the areas immediately adjacent to the boundaries, the micro-climate
changes significantly. As one moves up the hillsides on either side of
Chiles Valley, the summer fog blanket gets thinner and thinner and disappears
altogether at approximately 1400 to 1500 feet elevation.

Since the cold air drains down into the Chiles Valley, the night time
temperatures are quite a bit higher on the steep slopes than on the valley
floor. In addition, the lack of fog allows a much faster temperature build
up during the day, reaching the daily high two to three hours earlier than
on the valley floor. Not only is the temperature drop at nightfall less,
but also much more gradual so that during a 24 hour period the heat summation is substantially higher on the slopes than within the proposed boundaries. In winter, the situation is reversed. Strong winds tend to chill the uplands creating a cooler climate than on the valley floor. Snowfall above 1400 feet has been observed many
times. The microclimatic limitations combined with enormous steepness and
very poor soil (serpentine, heavy sandstone formations, and shale out croppings)
create an abrupt change from the viticultural area to the areas surrounding
it. The Pope Valley to the north of the proposed viticultural area is also
significantly different. A combination of a lower elevation valley floor
and substantially higher mountains on the western side causes the formation
of inversion layers, which result in substantially higher average temperatures
during the growing season and significantly lower ones in the winter. In
addition, the summer fog from the Pacific Ocean never reaches the Pope
Valley. The petitioner stated that the particular interplay between climate
and soil make for unique growing conditions in the proposed area. The soils
within the proposed appellation are uncommonly well drained and of medium
fertility. The overall terrain gently slopes toward a series of creeks,
which act as natural drainage for surface as well as subterranean water.
The petitioner believes this is a good basis for high quality grapes. Uniform
elevation and relatively uniform soil make the proposed viticultural area
a clearly identifiable growing area. Almost all vineyards lie between 800
and 1000 feet elevation. As a general rule, the soils in the Chiles Valley
all belong to the Tehama Series: nearly level to gently slopping, well
drained Silt loams on flood plains and alluvial fans. The total planted
acreage in 1996 was roughly 1000 acres. The remaining plantable area does
not exceed 500 acres. This small size illuminates the petitioner's goal
of a well defined, specific appellation.

Geographical Brand Names

A brand name of viticultural significance may not be used unless the
wine meets the appellation of origin requirements for the geographical
area named. See 27 CFR 4.39(i).Consequently, establishment of this viticultural
area would preclude the use of the term "Chiles Valley" as a brand name
for wine, unless the wine can claim "Chiles Valley" as an appellation of
origin, or complies with one of the exceptions in the regulation.Proposed
Boundaries The boundaries of the Chiles Valley viticultural area may be
found on four 1:24,000 scale U.S.G.S. maps titled: St. Helena, CA(1960);
Rutherford, CA (1968); Chiles Valley, CA (1980); and Yountville, CA (1968).Paperwork
Reduction Act The provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44
U.S.C. 3507(j)) and its implementing regulations, 5 C.F.R. part 1320, do
not apply to this rule because no requirement to collect information is
proposed.Regulatory Flexibility Act It is hereby certified that this regulation
will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The establishment of a viticultural area is neither an endorsement nor
approval by ATF of the quality of wine produced in the area, but rather
an identification of an area that is distinct from surrounding areas. ATF
believes that the establishment of viticultural areas merely allows wineries
to more accurately describe the origin of their wines to consumers, and
helps consumers identify the wines they purchase. Thus, any benefit derived
from the use of a viticultural area name is the result of the proprietor's
own efforts and consumer acceptance of wine from the region. Accordingly,
a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. No new requirements
are imposed.

Executive Order 12866

It has been determined that this regulation is not a significant regulatory
action as defined by Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this proposal
is not subject to the analysis required by this executive order.Drafting
Information The principal author of this document is Thomas B. Busey, Regulations
Division, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.

List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9

Administrative practices and procedures, Consumer protection, Viticultural
areas, and Wine.

Authority and Issuance

Title 27 Code of Federal Regulations, part 9, American Viticultural
Areas, is amended as follows:

PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS

Paragraph 1. The authority citation for Part 9 continues to read as
follows:

Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.

Par. 2. Subpart C is amended by adding Sec. 9.154 to read as follows:

Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas

 

Sec. 9.154 Chiles Valley.

  • (a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this section
    is "Chiles Valley."
  • (b) Approved maps. The appropriate maps for determining the boundary
    of the Chiles Valley viticultural area are four 1:24,000 Scale U.S.G.S.
    topography maps. They are titled:
    • (1) St. Helena, CA 1960 photorevised 1980 (2) Rutherford, CA 1951 photorevised
      1968
    • (3) Chiles Valley, CA 1958 photorevised 1980
    • (4) Yountville, CA 1951 photorevised 1968
  • (c) Boundary. The Chiles Valley viticultural area is located in the
    State of California, entirely within the Napa Valley viticultural area.
    The boundaries of the Chiles Valley viticultural area, using landmarks
    and points of reference found on appropriate U.S.G.S. maps follow. The
    local names of roads are identified by name.
    • (1) Beginning on the St. Helena, CA quadrangle map at the northernmost
      corner of Rancho Catacula in Section 34, Township 9 North (T9N), Range
      5 West (R5W), Mount Diablo Base and Meridian (MDBM);
    • (2) Then in southwesterly direction along the Rancho Catacula boundary
      line to its intersection with the Rancho La Jota boundary line;
    • (3) Then in a south-southeasterly direction approximately 3,800 feet
      along the Rancho Catacula/Rancho La Jota boundary line to the point where
      the Rancho Catacula boundary separates from the common boundary with Rancho
      La Jota;
    • (4) Then in a southeasterly direction continuing along the Rancho
      Catacula boundary approximately 23,600 feet to a point of intersection,
      in the NE \1/4\ Sec. 19, T8N, R4W, on the Chiles Valley quadrangle map,
      with a county road known locally as Chiles and Pope Valley Road;
    • (5) Then in a southwesterly direction along Chiles and Pope Valley Road to a point where it first crosses an unnamed blueline stream in the SE \1/4\ Section
      19, T8N, R4W;
    • (6) Then following the unnamed stream in generally southeast direction
      to its intersection with the 1200 foot contour;
    • (7) Then following the 1200 foot contour in a northeasterly direction
      to a point of intersection with the Rancho Catacula boundary in section
      20, T8N, R4W;
    • (8) Then in a southeasterly direction along the Rancho Catcula boundary
      approximately 17,500 feet to the southwest corner of Rancho Catacula in
      section 34, T8N, R4W on the Yountville, CA, quadrangle map;
    • (9) Then in a northeasterly direction along the Rancho Catacula boundary
      approximately 650 feet to its intersection with the 1040 foot contour;
    • (10) Then along the 1040 foot contour in a generally east and northeast
      direction to its intersection with the Rancho Catacula boundary;
    • (11) Then in a northeasterly direction along the Rancho Catacula boundary
      approximately 1100 feet to its intersection with the 1040 foot contour;
    • (12) Then along the 1040 foot contour in an easterly direction and
      then in a northwesterly direction to its intersection of the Rancho Catacula
      boundary;
    • (13) Then in a southwesterly direction along the Rancho Catacula boundary
      approximately 300 feet to a point of intersection with a line of high voltage
      power lines;
    • (14) Then in a westerly direction along the high voltage line approximately
      650 feet to its intersection with the 1000 foot contour;
    • (15) Then continuing along the 1000 foot contour in a generally northwesterly direction to the point of intersection with the first unnamed blueline stream;
    • (16) Then along the unnamed stream in a northerly direction to its
      point of intersection with the 1200 foot contour;
    • (17) Then along the 1200 foot contour in a northwesterly direction
      to its points of intersection with the Rancho Catacula boundary in Section
      35, T9N, R5W on the St. Helena, CA, quadrangle map;
    • (18) Then along the Rancho Catacula boundary in a northwesterly direction
      approximately 5,350 feet to a northernmost corner of Rancho Catacula, the
      beginning point on the St. Helena quadrangle map a the northernmost corner
      of Rancho Catacula in Section 34, T9N, R5W, MDBM. Signed: September 30,
      1998.

John W. Magaw,Director. Approved: January 19, 1999.

John P. Simpson,

Deputy Assistant Secretary, Regulatory, Tariff and Trade Enforcement.

[FR Doc. 99-3759 Filed 2-16-99;8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-31-P